Confidence and Calibration of Activation Oracles for Reliable Interpretation of Language Model Internals
Abstract
Research evaluates confidence estimation methods for activation oracles, finding bootstrap mode frequency provides better-calibrated confidence scores than log-probability approaches.
Activation oracles aim to make the activations of other models legible to humans and yield promising results compared to white-box interpretability techniques. However, uncertainty quantification (UQ) for the natural-language outputs of such activation oracles is so far understudied. Here, we investigate 6 different methods for estimating the confidence of activation oracles and evaluate how well-calibrated their confidence scores are. Our experiments on 6,000 samples per oracle (varying verbalizer and context prompts) reveal that bootstrap mode frequency is the best-calibrated method among those tested (ECE 5.7% vs. 25.5% for the answer-word log-probability on Qwen3-8B; 10.3% vs. 13.1% on Qwen3.6-27B), and that the log-prob baseline can serve as a fast triage signal at a fraction of the cost. Code and the patched trainer are available at https://github.com/federicotorrielli/probabilistic_activation_oracles.
Community
we propose the first uncertainty-quantification benchmark for activation oracles, comparing six confidence estimators across two Qwen-family oracles. We also train and release, for the first time, an activation oracle and taboo target models for Qwen3.6-27B, extending the setup to a hybrid linear-plus-full attention architecture. Bootstrap confidence is best calibrated, while log-probability remains a cheap triage signal.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- What Single-Prompt Accuracy Misses: A Multi-Variant Reliability Audit of Language Models (2026)
- Distilling Self-Consistency into Verbal Confidence: A Pre-Registered Negative Result and Post-Hoc Rescue on Gemma 3 4B (2026)
- Calibrating LLMs with Semantic-level Reward (2026)
- Calibrated Confidence Estimation for Tabular Question Answering (2026)
- LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitly (2026)
- When Should a Language Model Trust Itself? Same-Model Self-Verification as a Conditional Confidence Signal (2026)
- ORCE: Order-Aware Alignment of Verbalized Confidence in Large Language Models (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605.26045 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 116
EvilScript/taboo-rock-gemma-4-E2B-it
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper